carlosperaile (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Ferrero gano ese partido por su buen tenis y no por la lesion de Nadal.Y encima resulta que Ferrero se lesiono para mas tiempo.Ferrero es el mejor!!

164jlg (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

nadal had a blister in the foot that day...that's why he lost

gonzogonzo93 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

io c'ero

franrafuki (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

no federer y ferrero.

fong03 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

I love both of these guys so much. I hate when they have to play each other so early in a tournament. I didn't want Rafa's streak to end, but at the same time I want JC to get healthy and get his ranking back up. He belongs in the top 20. I think he's got some good wins in him still. And I prefer Juan Carlos' hair short. :)

Currymastuh (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

rafa certainly is better, but theres nothing wrong with celebrating after beating nadal one of if not the best clay courter in the world, i'm sure rafa didnt mind it. and you make it sound like its a bad thing to win one slam you have to be great to win a slam and ferrero got the us open final that year too and was number one so his career wasnt a bad one, hes just at the tail end of his career

FadzoTheClown (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

The linesman were pretty poor i mean 2 of ferrero's shots were in and OK one was very close the other was obviously in. You'd think with quite an important tournament like Rome they'd have decent lines people :SI prefer Ferrero's hair longer even if he is hot all the time lol :)Its a real shame about Nadal's foot but he plays so much its not suprising he gets blisters :(the outcome would have been different if Nadal was well but Ferrero's a great player especially on clay

peterbaker261 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Maybe people are forgetting that Ferrero is an ex-champion at Roland Garros. He's got game on clay and showed it here.

DoubleMarmotte (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

at least 1 roland garros.

rpatrick21 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

no hewitt