Nabo00o (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

There's two BIG problems with dispooving this as space debris, and that's 1) that the "debris" or "particels" presumably reflecting the sun is clearly seen to be behind the tether.In other words, to reflect that much light the have to be GIGANTIC!!!!2) Some of the "particels" have are visually pulsating the light, that wouldn't normally happend if they were only reflecting it as they floated around.Now think about that for a minute all of you who are sceptical here...

RexEighty4 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

It's either an armada of UFO's piloted by space aliens flying around aimlessly or...more out of focus illuminated orbital debris. Come on people!

Golfanatyc (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

picking nose

depth0ffield (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

.. So, there are several factors that mislead the novice observer, and a guy like David Sereda or others just found a very good exploatable "misterious" subject to make documentaries!

depth0ffield (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

if you refer to the "notches", if you look closely repeated times, you can see that the same number or the same position of the nothes appear at DIFFERENT and ALL THE orbs when they are in the same position of the frame. This demostrates that the notches are not the shape of the orbs, but an effect on the camera (construction details)!Look here, not my video, and you will see the same effect:/watch?v=SYLHqv-foMk

OldSmellyCrotch (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Hi. I have looked at these other video of yours (very good) and in deed they display circular orbs. My objection is that they don't look anything like the object\objects observed in this video 3:44 for instance. They don't show the same characteristics. If you can duplicate that, then I would be a little more convinced.Keep up the good work :D

depth0ffield (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

sorry, one mistake in prevoius comments, the Venus movie is infact /watch?v=aBzz32YYNjo

depth0ffield (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

So you seem to have better observational skills like other posters, but don't know some technical facts, anyway, continue to observ the little details, inform better yourself and judge them harder.I have the integral demonstration of the space debris defocused orbs confused with ET spaceships in NASA video, in my personal web page in my profile (David Sereda Movie Analysis), but it's a pity it is in romanian language...maybe i will translate one day. Right now you can see the pictures :)

depth0ffield (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

You can see another video of mine, in night/low light this time, with the same camera, with Venus defocused/watch?v=ElTMu89GDfcand it is now no hexagon but circular, because iris is open to the maximum.Yet another movie of mine, again in low light whith the same pin,/watch?v=ElTMu89GDfcwhere again the defocused orb is circular, which intend to duplicate somehow other efect seen in the NASA video, that is deforming of the circular shape of the orbs toward the corners of the frame

depth0ffield (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

in my video is hexagon because the defocused orb tend to mimics the shape of the entrance pupil of the lens, which is from the iris mechanism. But with my camera, i have no control of the iris of the camera during the recording, and, because is day light, the iris is set automatically somehow toward minimum (thus the hexagonal shape). In the NASA video, it is low light, so the camera electronics open to the maximum the iris to gather maximum light...continue..