kingcrimson234 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

no he doesn't, he sounds like agent smith.

MysticWhizz (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Agent Smith is based on him, race2cube, well his voice is anyway.

MysticWhizz (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

He is explaining it so that leser beings such as ourselves can understand it :-) Of course you can't really have anything that we know of in 2d, because everything, ever quarks have length width and height, so you are right, but no-one cares because he's simplifying it in a hope that some really dumb people can understand it, like people who get C in GCSE Physics lol.

fonna (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

You mean Agent Smith.When I heard Agent Smith, I said he sounded like Carl Sagan.

Darkshine42 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

what would actually happen to a two-dimensional object entering three dimensional space?

CallMeTaca (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

I know a carl

Blahsmack (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

the evil version of Carl Sagan

stargen5 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

The fallacy is Carls arguement is that he assumes example of a 2d being acting like 3d being. Because even our thinking and hearing is a product of 3d.You cannot create a 2d brain that thinks ...or think as 3d. There is no such thing as 2d proton or electron that makes existence possible. Our concepts of 2d is merely a product of 3d brain. So is 4d is merely a product of 3d brain. there is only 3d...everything else is just bull shit created by a 3d brain to satisfy a 3d brain's reqiurement.

xblacqx (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

sounds like morphius from matrix

BrandonBlaq (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

sounds like he's trying to explain God as something in the 4th dimension