|
daveckecker (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
damn amazing voice!!!
quaversarecheesy (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Oh it was an earlier comment by 07kingj07... I just forgot reply.., saying that Diana Vickers is amazing, and I even read a comment somewhere that they should do a duet together. Laughable really...
zedy87 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
who even compared her to him?? she is the reason they chose this song, but she can't even sing!!this is an amazing version though
quaversarecheesy (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Don't even bring Diana into it... errrgh, she's talentless... this man is a legend
WonderfulBliss (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Exactly..break up in tears..it´s sounds wonderful:)
SillyEagle1992 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
His voice always sounds like he's just about to break up in tears. Which I find pretty fucking awesome.
RobaVecchia (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
what an artist!!!!!he's one of the best!!!!take a loook at my damien's cover too!!!!!!
Robbybobbybabby (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
yes
crieswhicharewings (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
It's all about interpretation with a cover. As popular as these "trembly-voiced emotion" covers have been in recent years, it's obvious that it works to some extent. Actually, I don't even like the Leonard Cohen version BECAUSE it is so flat and emotionless.
dananddanfilms (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Leonard Cohen's own version is the best. He doesn't over-emote, which is exactly how it should be. It's a song about being in a state of emotional deadness. All these covers are all done with trembly-voiced emotion, and I don't think it sits well with the lyrics. |