du2vye (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Dems voted for 2 lawyers who promised to stick up for the popular vote in 2004. They never considered an investigation. We have ONE party.

armyofda12monkeys (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

i just dont get when he says they flipped the votes where bush was already winning, aka if he was at 54% he should be at 46%. that part didnt make sense to me, i can understand that someone voting a straight democratic ticket, that some lady all the way down the list no one heard of has less votes than Kerry is highly suspicious, aka they switch the votes only for bush/kerry and not the rest of a persons votes.

franimaljones (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

i don't think Dems should play dirty, I think they should investigate, prosecute and resume our democracy. I liked what Spoonameyer said about liking Democracy best, over and above liking his party best. take heed.

wpditerl (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

It all makes so much sense. The Dems need to start playing dirty like the republicans. Seriously because this is going to happen again with THIS election.

PeteMaine (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Clearest explanation I have heard of the theft of the presidential vote in 2004.

flukshun (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

i think viking is suggesting the democrats "balance the equation".i say we blow this wide open. there can be no room for such conspiracies in a democracy, i dont care who benefits.

elusiveconductor (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

if you listened to this guy and parsed what he said then you'd realize your comment is daft.

Vikingpurplelove (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)

Holy Sh@#%@T,Calling all democrat hackers, you've just been drafted.