|
ElliexThexNinja (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
she is a really good singer but its not the same as tracys because tracy's was much more natural! this sounds too modernised and influenced!
tlk2ul8ar (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I thought this would be shocking but I actually like it!Only thing I dont like is the synthesizer sounding thing when she says the I eee I part...
F8LAMB (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
wow when i saw the title i thought: oh no but it is nice ! good job... but i also don't like the digital piano and tracy chapman is still the best
cooookkkkiiieee (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Shee is so pretty !! I miss her songss :(But shee is so good (l)
chocolateticious (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
like tracy's version much much better... -.-
Fallenangelt14 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
The Origanla Version by Tracy Chapman is better to me, but she did a good remak of the original song it sounds really good.
lilvanzantdancr27 (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
i love this song and this is going to be our lyrical song for dance. i now can see why my dance teacher picked it, she sings it with soul and its so beautiful!!!!!!
genderpretender (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
correct me if im wrong but i think she quit the sugar babes because they were too commercial etc. and she wnated to pursue her own unique beautiful style - like this (this cover is brilliant but i still think the original by tracy chapman is the best)
FrauleinCaroline (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
i love Tracy but I admit this is really nice version! i can't believe it's by a sugababes singer r whoever. the piano is a nice touch.
Tazzombie (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
I really wish they would've used a natural grand piano than piano with a digital effect. It ruined the song for me.Beautiful voice, but Tracy still owns it. |
