|
MetaphysicsAddict (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
again, some of the significant data have been replicated by skeptics themselves. Did you even bother to watch the links I sent you in the PM?
MetaphysicsAddict (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
They would have to re-do the experimet under Randi's conditions, but they do not trust randi. He is a dishonest person with a history of lying about this subject. I don't trust him either."'peer' review my ass. I thought the guy just said psi was TABOO. Convenient excuse for a LACK of peer review."the data discussed here are all peer reviewed. Sheldrake's data are too, including in the journal of consciousness studies, journal of scientific exploration, and others.
j0hnwi11iams (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Maybe he's not willing to be a cheap casino for charlatans. Getting 40% out of 25% expected shouldn't take 8 years. Getting 32% out of 25% expected shouldn't take 8 years. Wide differences like that produce high confidence very quickly.
j0hnwi11iams (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
That does not answer my question which was, why hasn't anyone claimed the prize, especially when claiming 40% hit rate over 25% expected. "peer" review my ass. I thought the guy just said psi was TABOO. Convenient excuse for a LACK of peer review.
MetaphysicsAddict (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
"-he isn't a scientist but he keeps using physicist created words"He is a Ph.D. scientist, although not a physicist. But some people doing this type of research are physicists. "All psi-crap talks about breaking a fundamental law of physics"No it does not. psi does not involve violating natural laws."Your username tries to justify meta-crap by using the word 'physics'"do you know what the word "metaphysics" means?
icedthai (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
"Radin is a credentialed pyshologist and engineer who has published in peer reviewed journals."-he isn't a scientist but he keeps using physicist created words (quantum,All psi-crap talks about breaking a fundamental law of physics: entropy, conservation of energy/momentum, casuality, etc.But there are no examples of any of those laws being broken ever.Your username tries to justify meta-crap by using the word "physics". It's not physics and you're not a physicist.
MetaphysicsAddict (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
"This isn't science, it's crap."Radin is summarizing scientific research into psi phenomena, but you failed you discuss the data. "and is throwing out all these science terms to give himself credibility."Radin is a credentialed pyshologist and engineer who has published in peer reviewed journals. "'Psi' is not science, it's religion. Leave science out of religion, we want nothing to do with you."Psi phenomena can be scientifically studied, and they have been. watch the video
icedthai (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
This isn't science, it's crap.This guy is a non-physicist, as opposed to me, and is throwing out all these science terms to give himself credibility.As a physicist, people don't confuse me or what I say with people who call themselves "metaphysicists"."Psi" is not science, it's religion. Leave science out of religion, we want nothing to do with you. Secularism rules!
MetaphysicsAddict (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
"Randi is asking someone to replicate a test already 'published'."Yes, the data have been published in peer reviewed journals. Some of the studies were videotaped. Some were replicated by skeptics! Are they frauds too?*Either* (a) they are all frauds, (b) none of them are, or (c) some are but some are not. There are too many significant data (some from skeptics!) by too many people to dismiss as "fraud".... unless you wish to argue for a conspiracy theory.
MetaphysicsAddict (December 31, 1969 at 6:59 pm)
Radin was the one making that claim, but I was trying to discuss sheldrake's reasons. Anyway, radin actually said that it would take 8 years for a single study to result in odds of a milllion to one, which is what Randi requires (and won't accept 900,000 to 1). But Randi seems to be a very dishonest and ideologically driven person. Watch sheldrake's google video on "the extended mind" right here on youtube to hear the reaons for distrusting Randi. |
